A Hidden Prophecy of the Coming
of The WORD+ of GOD, JESUS CHRIST, Hidden
in Plain Sight . . . within HIS WORD.
Sometimes it takes an
unsophisticated Reader of Scripture to discover a prophecy hidden within the
Hebrew Scriptures.
Why is that true ?
Because a novice is looking for
the PEARL+ of Great Price.
The Picture of THAT PEARL+ of
Great Price is always before the reader’s eyes.
Thus, the reader is always
searching the Scripture through a special lens . That special lens holds a
specific PATTERN before the eyes of the reader.
Thus, when the reader comes
across a verse which FITS EXACTLY into that Divine Pattern , he discovers a
prophecy which has been hidden from the eyes of jaded or bored or complacent scholars.
Isaiah 55:11 is such a case.
Here is the English version via the KJV.
So shall MY
word be that goeth forth out of MY
mouth:
it shall not return unto ME void,
but it shall accomplish that which I please,
and it shall prosper in the thing whereto I
sent it.
Isaiah
55:11
+
+ +
Nothing in this verse is apparently out of order until the Rules of
Hebrew Grammar are applied to the Hebrew verbs.
Let us keep this rule in mind. The 3rd person singular [
he, she, it ] has a peculiarity in the Hebrew language: there is NO “it.”
Everything is assigned a gender as a “he” or “she.” Even tables and chairs, books and paper.
The gender [ he or she ] is indicated by the Hebrew verb
form to which the pronoun is attached.
However, in our English versions , we add in “it” so that
a verse makes sense in our culture, for we do not call a table a “he.” A non-living item like a table is considered
an “it.”
So then, let’s look carefully at Isaiah 55:11 and
substitute the 3rd person MASCULINE singular “he” in the place of “it” when “it” is supposed
to be a masculine as indicated by the Hebrew verb governing the pronoun.
So shall MY
word be that goeth forth
out of MY
mouth:
he shall not return unto ME void,
but he shall
accomplish that which I please,
and he
shall prosper in the thing
whereto I sent him.
Isaiah
55:11
With the grammar corrected, “he” would indicate a MALE
PERSON is being referenced as the “he,” correct ?
Then, what MALE PERSON is " the WORD"
whom The LORD GOD has sent forth ?
+
+ +
In the beginning was THE WORD+,
and THE WORD+ was
with GOD,
and THE WORD+ was
GOD.
The same was in the beginning with GOD.
John
1:1-2
So, let us read Isaiah 55:11 with that distinction in
mind.
Hence:
So shall MY WORD+ be
that goeth forth out of MY mouth:
HE+ shall not return unto ME void,
but HE+ shall accomplish
that which I please,
and HE+
shall prosper in the thing
whereto I sent HIM+.
Isaiah
55:11
Does the Hebrew grammar agree in any other way with using
“he” in this verse ?
YES. The Hebrew
noun WORD in the first clause, is also masculine. Thus, “HE+ “ fits perfectly into the context of the verse.
The LORD GOD sent forth HIS Only-Begotten SON+ , HIS
LIVING WORD+.
That LIVING WORD+, HIS SON+, was:
· promised as the
SEED of woman,
· born of the SEED
of Abraham,
· born of the tribe
of Judah through David
· born of the
Divine SEED+ of a young Hebrew virgin
BORN as the SON+ of GOD … exactly
as promised !
HE+ was sent for a Purpose . That Purpose was planned and
agreed upon by the ELOHIM and recorded for us in Genesis those many long years ago.
Glory be to GOD in the Highest
and on earth, PEACE,
GOODWILL toward men !
